CAVEMANforum - The most popular Paleo diet and caveman exercise discussion site
September 08, 2010, 04:37:11 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Check out our FAQ
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Long term low carb studies  (Read 1508 times) Bookmark and Share
NutMeg
Lieutenant
***

Karma: +22/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 350



View Profile WWW
« on: January 29, 2010, 06:17:20 AM »

I have been looking for a good research article that actually studies a gourp of people that have been low carb for a long term, maybe 2+ years.  All the studies I have found have been 1 year or less, and they usually say something about LC being good fro weight loss and lipid profile, but then there is a discalaimer that it is probably only temporary and there needs to be long term research.

In my reading I found this study http://www.eskiny.com/pdf/6.pdf.  Which is comparing a LC and LF diet.  The people were allowed to self limit calories.  Well, it turns out the LF people were averaging about 150 carbs a day.  Now that is not LC for sure, but it is a moderate carb diet and I would consider it crab restricted too.  The average 'dieter' eats about 300 carbs a day. 

I guess I feel like it is flawed research in that they did not allow the LF group to drink juice and do things that most people who eat LF do.  So it made their carb intake artifically low for the 12 week period of the study.  The typical 'healthy' diet is much higher in carb.

Anyway.  Just one of those things i found and got annoyed with Smiley
Logged

Meghan
Primarily primal Smiley
Il Capo
Major
***

Karma: +43/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 838


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2010, 12:46:08 PM »

The Innuit are low carb. There's lot of info in here about their diet and health.
Logged

On the ethics of meat eating:
Okay, have you ever been around chickens? They are stupid, uncooperative, inconvenient, ill-tempered creatures. They get what they deserve. F*ck chickens.

Mark Rippetoe
Warren Dew
General
****

Karma: +246/-22
Offline Offline

Posts: 2331



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2010, 01:36:52 PM »

Well, the Inuit were low carb before meeting westerners.  Some more recent studies may not properly note that that has changed.
Logged
ajmesa
Major
***

Karma: +63/-60
Offline Offline

Posts: 835



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2010, 10:32:42 PM »

I have no idea why everyone keeps mentioning the Inuit as optimum. That's what happens when humans are pushed to the end, when they have to other place to live. That's is not optimum. I think you can find history of much healthier tribes in the American plains and other less extreme places.
Logged

Right Now.
Il Capo
Major
***

Karma: +43/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 838


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2010, 11:31:56 PM »

Just for the record, I did not state them as ideal, just as an example of low carb. Peoples with access to vegetation and fruits (virtually everyone not living in the poles) are likely moderate carb on average.
Logged

On the ethics of meat eating:
Okay, have you ever been around chickens? They are stupid, uncooperative, inconvenient, ill-tempered creatures. They get what they deserve. F*ck chickens.

Mark Rippetoe
Tarlach
General
****

Karma: +100/-20
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012


Fighting fit!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2010, 01:50:35 AM »

1 in 5 hunter gatherer tribes are carnivorous and most others eat predominately meat.

Logged

The "Seven Deadly Sins"

• Grains (wheat/rice/oats etc) . . . . . • Dairy (milk/yogurt/butter/cheese etc)
• Refined foods (salt/sugars etc ) . . • Nightshades (peppers/tomato/eggplant)
• Tubers (potato/arrowroot etc) . . . . • Legumes (soy/beans/peas)
• Modernly palatable (cashews/olives etc)
Il Capo
Major
***

Karma: +43/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 838


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2010, 03:46:13 PM »

I agree with the study, however I think we are defining low carb differently. For me, low carb is less than 50g/day. Assuming a hunter-gatherer intake of 2,500 cals (could be more since they are hunting) and that 1g carbs = 4 cals, they only need 200 cals (less than 10% of their total intake) to be moderate carb in my book.

The study mentions that a lot of them get more than 85% of their calories from meat (both fat and protein). That would still mean that they would be getting ~ 375 cals from carbs which means ~ 90g carbs.

Groups living in more extreme conditions would probably get less carbs.
Logged

On the ethics of meat eating:
Okay, have you ever been around chickens? They are stupid, uncooperative, inconvenient, ill-tempered creatures. They get what they deserve. F*ck chickens.

Mark Rippetoe
Tarlach
General
****

Karma: +100/-20
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012


Fighting fit!


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2010, 05:38:10 PM »

The 85% also didn't include gathered foods, which includes small animals, insects, larva, mollusks, etc.
Logged

The "Seven Deadly Sins"

• Grains (wheat/rice/oats etc) . . . . . • Dairy (milk/yogurt/butter/cheese etc)
• Refined foods (salt/sugars etc ) . . • Nightshades (peppers/tomato/eggplant)
• Tubers (potato/arrowroot etc) . . . . • Legumes (soy/beans/peas)
• Modernly palatable (cashews/olives etc)
ajmesa
Major
***

Karma: +63/-60
Offline Offline

Posts: 835



View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2010, 03:07:21 PM »

We have lived in many different parts of the world and are accustomed to all the different environments. Pick whatever carb consumption you feel best at, just make sure all your ingredients are paleo.
Logged

Right Now.
Warren Dew
General
****

Karma: +246/-22
Offline Offline

Posts: 2331



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2010, 03:43:55 PM »

I agree with the study, however I think we are defining low carb differently. For me, low carb is less than 50g/day.
I think that qualifies as "very low carb", at least.  To the nonpaleo world, 100g/day qualifies as well into the "low carb" range.
Logged
NutMeg
Lieutenant
***

Karma: +22/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 350



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2010, 08:56:13 AM »

I agree that 150 carbs is not LOW carb, more moderate crab.  The problem with the study is that the average person that eats a low fat diet eats FAR more than 150 carbs a day.  So the study was not comparing a true low fat diet with a low crab diet.  It was comparing a low carb diet with a moderate crab diet, which is not the same.
Logged

Meghan
Primarily primal Smiley
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.175 seconds with 25 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.04s, 3q)